People are worried about 5G tower the NYT reports

Found this page helpful? Please like. Wants to help other and spread awareness? Please share

In a new article posted at 05/11/2022 the NYT reports that people across new york are worried because 5G cell phone towers are being installed overnight, next to their homes and apartments.

The NYT continues to promote that 5G radiation is not a problem

Most of the reported complaints in the article seem to be regarding the size of the towers and the new view from their windows. The reporter does say that “some have expressed unfounded fears about 5G “.

Quick to dismiss these worries is “Alex Wyglinski, the associate dean of graduate studies and a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute” who said, “residents need not worry”.

Some of the neighbors to these new antenna evens promote the propaganda themselves. One of them is quoted “People say that it is safe; the F.C.C. says it’s safe and everything,” she said. “We’re just worried that it’s so close to my son’s bedroom”.

Screenshot from the article – https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/05/nyregion/nyc-5g-towers.html#commentsContainer

Looking in the wrong places for help

The report says that some tried contacting the local municipality, others try neighborhood assembly, and others ask for radiation safety tests to be done. The public probably thinks that if there is something wrong, the test will show it. They probably don’t know yet that the tests are done according to very high standards, therefore will most likely give the “ALL OK”

I wonder how long it will take them to understand that the F.C.C. so-called safety standards are high and don’t protect people’s health. Would it be by reading the science on the changes, damages, and health effects done by RF exposure in levels far below the F.C.C guidelines? or would it be only after symptoms (such as headaches, fatigue, memory problems and others, which might be the first signs of EHS) will appear?

Can we trust the F.C.C.?

The F.C.C is captured (run and lead) by the industry that it suppose to regulate. Its’ guidelines are high and based on the wrong assumptions that other than heating of the tissue in high levels or Radiofrequency radiation, there are no health effects to RF exposure. The F.C.C is looking the other way when complaints or studies showing the health effects of RF appear. The F.C.C is not to be trusted on this.